Suit 1: "We need to spin up for a training mission. This request came from below."
Suit 2: "Don't you mean from above?"
Suit 1: "No, the folks in the sub-basements."
Suit 2: "Ah. OK. What do you need?"
Suit 1: "We are going to need to activate some of our assets to play the part and see if our boys can sniff them out. Let's do low yield, low tech bombs on civilian targets and infrastructure."
Suit 2: "Kind of boring boss. What kind of faces do you want? Where are we going to make this happen? Are we going to call it a drill, or just see if our boys are on their toes?"
Suit 1: "Well, we are going to need deniability on this one (if you know what I mean.) Let's get multiple face types to cover the gamut. We will burn whichever one suits the purpose best at the time." After a few seconds of thought she adds, "We'll drop this one on the Boston Marathon. That allows for an international angle if necessary. They would prefer to slant this to the right-wing patriot movement, but in case we don't get good dope on the results, be sure to have some international flavors in the mix, as well as some left-wing, disgruntled veteran, and anarchist faces out there as well...we need plenty of options."
Suit 2: "Simple enough. Give me the basics and I will do the rest, boss."
Suit 1: "Bomb in a backpack. Make them crude and simple. Tell the assets that they need to drop at a specific time...make it a 60 second window. Half do drops and the other half are designated to pick up and place in new locations. Let them all know in advance that this is a hot training run to test our agents."
Suit 2: "You are making it too simple, boss. I will have it worked up in less than a week."
Suit 1: "Look, done properly, we will have multiple angles to spin this."
Suit 2: "Not my first rodeo, madam. I got it. If our guys sniff them out before kaboom, then we get to pat ourselves on the back for averting a terrorist act. If we miss, we get to lay blame in a multitude of directions. The only problem is that we are going to be burning some assets...again! And we might lose some innocents."
Suit 1: "Power doesn't come cheap."
Suit 2: "No shit!"
A few days later
Suit 2: "Hey Boss! I had to make a change and I need you to give me the OK before I pull the trigger."
Suit 1: "Hit me"
Suit 2: "I don't trust all of our assets to get this one right, especially given the nature of the plan. You are looking for the domestic angle, and our locals are acting wary of the training op. I wouldn't be surprised if they left out the detonators, or some other critical component. I want to get some professionals in on this. The idea is to use some contractors to do the work. I will hire several different companies to operate in various profiles. Some will do drops, some pick-ups, and the rest will be on standby for 'detection,'" he said raising his fingers to make floating quote signs.
Suit 1: "OK. How are we paying for this?"
Suit 2: "Our gun operation in Idaho and eastern Washington has net a tremendous profit in the past six months. Sandy Hook was an unexpected benefit and drove those profits through the roof. We also got some extra Charge runs through our southern tunnel network for an additional profit boost...Mexico had a great growing season. Accounts was siphoning off for another operation that was cancelled, and the funds were available."
Suit 1: "How much?"
Suit 2: "How much...what?"
Suit 1: "How much is it costing us?"
Suit 2: "Just over 3."
Suit 1: "Great! That sounds like a bargain. So the contractors are going to set and det?"
Suit 2: "That is the main plan. The assets will still drop and shop, and we will have primary control on those dets if needed."
Suit 1: "I like it. Approved."
Weeks later
Suit 1: "Give it too me straight."
Suit 2: "We're covered on multiple angles. We have..."
Suit 1: "Don't you dare blow smoke up my ass. I already have the Infowars data. They pegged your contractors and one of the back packs. How do they get this stuff so fast?"
Suit 2: "Right. Look, the FBI got a jump and released photos of the back pack before we could make adjustments. We will be covered. Several of our assets were carrying similar packs, as they were all instructed to carry black packs. That was part of the plan. The media is already running with the patriot, Tea Party, right-wing, pro-gun blame game, and the best part is, they came up with it all on their own. We didn't even need to anonymously leak it to them this time. At least the long-term psyop is working."
Suit 1: "Great. Back on topic, please."
Suit 2: "Sorry. Based on our incoming video and volunteered civilian footage, we can go with almost any of our faces, except the anarchists. As usual, they didn't stick to plan and carried brightly colored packs. One even brought their kids out."
Suit 1: "Though they really want a right-wing culprit, I just don't think that is going to fly. There are too many bloggers out with preemptive stories that are far to close to what the truth would be. We cannot risk it. We'll have more opportunities later to get them. I also don't think the left-wing assets you chose would hold up to scrutiny. What does that leave us?"
Suit 2: "Well, we have multiple veteran types - old and young. There are the South Africans, the Indonesian Muslims, the Pakis, the anti-IMF Cypriots, the Russian Muslims, Libyans, Syrians, Iranians, and that wacked out North Korean couple."
Suit 1: "Well..."
Suit 2: "Oh! And...sorry, our Chinese anti-American group. There were seven of them."
Suit 1: "OK. Let's narrow this down to Muslim extremists. It fits our current overseas agenda and long term M.O. Where does that put us?"
Suit 2: "That leaves us with six facial choices and about twenty assets."
Suit 1: "What about the Russians? Tell me about them. The Russian angle may serve our Syrian purposes."
Suit 2: "Yeah, well, we had only developed one man, and we told him to bring another for this operation since it was at least a two man job. He brought his 19-year old brother, whom he had taken under his wing a couple of years ago. We brought him in as an asset when the Russians tipped off the FBI about him. The FBI did a cursory check and sent out a memo that our man intercepted. We used our FBI credentials and spent some time on bringing him up and got him to display radical tendencies to pass muster when the time came. We paid for his trip to Russia to get more training. He took the whole bait and believes he was working for the FBI as a double agent. He took his work seriously and believed he was helping the cause. They were one of our back-up teams for this op."
Suit 1: "What was his op mission on this?"
Suit 2: "He was to attend the race, make some rounds, and be certain not to stick out. He was advised that there would be a large contingent on the look out for a potential bomber. He was tasked with placing two packages at two different locations at specific times and not getting caught in the process. We had control of the dets, just in case. We offered him a big bonus for not getting caught before the det time, and he and his brother did a good job. Hell, everyone did a good job, since none were detected beforehand. They also built a device very similar to what Craft put together, but so did most of the others, per the plan."
Suit 1: "What kind of images do we have on them?"
Suit 2: "That is one of the issues we are sorting through. Because they were a back-up team, we only have limited footage, and the majority of it came from the civilian sector. We were tracking all of the more 'domestic' types per the plan, with the Iranians and Koreans as the secondaries. The other problem is that the younger brother was not carrying a black backpack as specified, but grey. He placed it, but we don't have good video of the act, and it doesn't fit our base plan. He also did not place it in a perfect location."
Suit 1: "Get graphics on it. Run up some basic civy images for general ID release. Be sure they are degraded. No high def stuff yet."
Suit 2: "Gotcha. What are we going to do when they get outed? You know these types are not going to just roll over and take the fall."
Suit 1: "That's not going to be our problem. Let the locals and FBI take care of that problem.If we work it up, these 'armed and very dangerous Muslim extremists' will find their way into the morgue for resisting."
Suit 2: "That's how it usually happens. But what if it doesn't? Cornered people don't always react the way we expect."
Suit 1: "We have the media and public perception on our side. That is all we need. The bombers have already been convicted, tried, and hung in the court of public opinion, if you have been paying any attention. When it comes time, we can prove they placed the bombs; we can prove they were radicalized; we can prove the eldest went to Russia for training; we can prove they made explosives. We can even gen up some old friends if needed. In fact, we can prove or do anything we want. We have the technology and the unfettered word of the government on our side, and they have nothing. They cannot prove they were working for the FBI or anyone else. They cannot prove they were sent out on a training mission. They cannot prove anything that benefits them."
Suit 2: "What about the grey backpack? An the Craft guys?"
Suit 1: "Details like those are inconsequential. People only see what they want to see...what we want them to see. The media faithfully reports as truth what we feed them. Jones and his followers will continue to be conspiracy theorists regardless of the facts. The media frenzy for the upcoming manhunt will blur the edges and make everything that much more plausible. What idiot would expend millions of dollars and man hours to chase down a couple of innocent Russian Muslim extremists?"
Suit 2: "I shall reserve comment on that last one, boss."
Suit 1: "Just spin up some images. They have nowhere to go. The media will run with it and the public will eat it up."
Suit 2: "I forgot to mention one thing."
Suit 1: "What's that?"
Suit 2: "The younger brother is an American Citizen. Made so on Sept 11, 2012."
Suit 1: (chuckling) "How fitting. I don't see an issue. NDAA will take care of that if he lives, which he won't. I have one word...GITMO."
Suit 2: "Hmmph..."
Suit 1: "Get the graphics. Get it out. Make sure we have enough to get the job done."
Did it happen like this? Probably not. Did it happen like what has been portrayed in the media? No, it didn't. This is just an illustration to show that things are not always what they may seem. I spent some years in the deceit game decades ago, and personally witnessed governmental deception and the use of patsies. It was a regular occurrence for government operatives to develop assets, only to burn them later in order to create cover for illicit dealings and cover for other operations. The deception game is one of the government's most valuable tools. It is paid for with billions of dollars in ill gotten gains in order to provide political cover.
Based on the evidence as has been released, there is ZERO proof that these brothers did what the government says they did (as far as the actual bombings go.) There is also ZERO proof that the government did this operation themselves. Likewise, there has been ZERO evidence presented that implicates anyone in the Boston bombing. All we have to go on is the word of the government through the mouthpiece of the non-investigating media, coupled with non-incriminating photos (some of which have been obviously doctored) and video.
Some people may say that the actions of the brothers following the bombing implicates them in the act. Does it? If you were set-up by your government for an act of terrorism, would you turn yourself in? Would you go quietly or would you fight back like a cornered animal? If you believed that you were working for your government on an operation, only to have your actions turned on you, and knowing that what you did, when looked through a lens in only one direction (one that only the government controls) could not be disputed, realizing that there was no way you could ever be proven innocent, how would you act?
I am not saying that these two brothers did not commit these heinous acts, but I am also not saying they did. Unlike many people, I still believe in the premiss of innocent until proven guilty IN A COURT OF LAW. I find it tyrannical what our government has done in the wake of the Boston bombing. I find it dispicable what Americans have degraded into. I find it disconcerting that so many embrace the chains of tyranny in the false sense that it provides a security that does not, nor will ever exist. I find it deplorable that the majority fail to condemn the government for foisting the falseness of a few men being a threat to national security. A few men can NEVER be a threat to national security! NEVER! If you believe this lie, you should seriously seek psychological help. Our rights are being stripped from every one of us in the name of a complete psyop fabrication, and The People are applauding. We have become a nation of complete fools, with the inability to think critically or rationally. You deserve the shit sandwich you are about to be served, and I am sure you will extend your chained wrists in appreciation of it, gladly accepting the offer of "mustard with your sandwich, sir."
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
REEF, AYE!
Copyright AbsoluteSurvivalist.com 2013. All Rights Reserved.
The preceding article may be reproduced in WHOLE for publication on the web or email for non-commercial purposes only, and/or linked in any web publication. It may not be reproduced in part in any manner or form, in any media for any reason.
Suit 2: "Don't you mean from above?"
Suit 1: "No, the folks in the sub-basements."
Suit 2: "Ah. OK. What do you need?"
Suit 1: "We are going to need to activate some of our assets to play the part and see if our boys can sniff them out. Let's do low yield, low tech bombs on civilian targets and infrastructure."
Suit 2: "Kind of boring boss. What kind of faces do you want? Where are we going to make this happen? Are we going to call it a drill, or just see if our boys are on their toes?"
Suit 1: "Well, we are going to need deniability on this one (if you know what I mean.) Let's get multiple face types to cover the gamut. We will burn whichever one suits the purpose best at the time." After a few seconds of thought she adds, "We'll drop this one on the Boston Marathon. That allows for an international angle if necessary. They would prefer to slant this to the right-wing patriot movement, but in case we don't get good dope on the results, be sure to have some international flavors in the mix, as well as some left-wing, disgruntled veteran, and anarchist faces out there as well...we need plenty of options."
Suit 2: "Simple enough. Give me the basics and I will do the rest, boss."
Suit 1: "Bomb in a backpack. Make them crude and simple. Tell the assets that they need to drop at a specific time...make it a 60 second window. Half do drops and the other half are designated to pick up and place in new locations. Let them all know in advance that this is a hot training run to test our agents."
Suit 2: "You are making it too simple, boss. I will have it worked up in less than a week."
Suit 1: "Look, done properly, we will have multiple angles to spin this."
Suit 2: "Not my first rodeo, madam. I got it. If our guys sniff them out before kaboom, then we get to pat ourselves on the back for averting a terrorist act. If we miss, we get to lay blame in a multitude of directions. The only problem is that we are going to be burning some assets...again! And we might lose some innocents."
Suit 1: "Power doesn't come cheap."
Suit 2: "No shit!"
A few days later
Suit 2: "Hey Boss! I had to make a change and I need you to give me the OK before I pull the trigger."
Suit 1: "Hit me"
Suit 2: "I don't trust all of our assets to get this one right, especially given the nature of the plan. You are looking for the domestic angle, and our locals are acting wary of the training op. I wouldn't be surprised if they left out the detonators, or some other critical component. I want to get some professionals in on this. The idea is to use some contractors to do the work. I will hire several different companies to operate in various profiles. Some will do drops, some pick-ups, and the rest will be on standby for 'detection,'" he said raising his fingers to make floating quote signs.
Suit 1: "OK. How are we paying for this?"
Suit 2: "Our gun operation in Idaho and eastern Washington has net a tremendous profit in the past six months. Sandy Hook was an unexpected benefit and drove those profits through the roof. We also got some extra Charge runs through our southern tunnel network for an additional profit boost...Mexico had a great growing season. Accounts was siphoning off for another operation that was cancelled, and the funds were available."
Suit 1: "How much?"
Suit 2: "How much...what?"
Suit 1: "How much is it costing us?"
Suit 2: "Just over 3."
Suit 1: "Great! That sounds like a bargain. So the contractors are going to set and det?"
Suit 2: "That is the main plan. The assets will still drop and shop, and we will have primary control on those dets if needed."
Suit 1: "I like it. Approved."
Weeks later
Suit 1: "Give it too me straight."
Suit 2: "We're covered on multiple angles. We have..."
Suit 1: "Don't you dare blow smoke up my ass. I already have the Infowars data. They pegged your contractors and one of the back packs. How do they get this stuff so fast?"
Suit 2: "Right. Look, the FBI got a jump and released photos of the back pack before we could make adjustments. We will be covered. Several of our assets were carrying similar packs, as they were all instructed to carry black packs. That was part of the plan. The media is already running with the patriot, Tea Party, right-wing, pro-gun blame game, and the best part is, they came up with it all on their own. We didn't even need to anonymously leak it to them this time. At least the long-term psyop is working."
Suit 1: "Great. Back on topic, please."
Suit 2: "Sorry. Based on our incoming video and volunteered civilian footage, we can go with almost any of our faces, except the anarchists. As usual, they didn't stick to plan and carried brightly colored packs. One even brought their kids out."
Suit 1: "Though they really want a right-wing culprit, I just don't think that is going to fly. There are too many bloggers out with preemptive stories that are far to close to what the truth would be. We cannot risk it. We'll have more opportunities later to get them. I also don't think the left-wing assets you chose would hold up to scrutiny. What does that leave us?"
Suit 2: "Well, we have multiple veteran types - old and young. There are the South Africans, the Indonesian Muslims, the Pakis, the anti-IMF Cypriots, the Russian Muslims, Libyans, Syrians, Iranians, and that wacked out North Korean couple."
Suit 1: "Well..."
Suit 2: "Oh! And...sorry, our Chinese anti-American group. There were seven of them."
Suit 1: "OK. Let's narrow this down to Muslim extremists. It fits our current overseas agenda and long term M.O. Where does that put us?"
Suit 2: "That leaves us with six facial choices and about twenty assets."
Suit 1: "What about the Russians? Tell me about them. The Russian angle may serve our Syrian purposes."
Suit 2: "Yeah, well, we had only developed one man, and we told him to bring another for this operation since it was at least a two man job. He brought his 19-year old brother, whom he had taken under his wing a couple of years ago. We brought him in as an asset when the Russians tipped off the FBI about him. The FBI did a cursory check and sent out a memo that our man intercepted. We used our FBI credentials and spent some time on bringing him up and got him to display radical tendencies to pass muster when the time came. We paid for his trip to Russia to get more training. He took the whole bait and believes he was working for the FBI as a double agent. He took his work seriously and believed he was helping the cause. They were one of our back-up teams for this op."
Suit 1: "What was his op mission on this?"
Suit 2: "He was to attend the race, make some rounds, and be certain not to stick out. He was advised that there would be a large contingent on the look out for a potential bomber. He was tasked with placing two packages at two different locations at specific times and not getting caught in the process. We had control of the dets, just in case. We offered him a big bonus for not getting caught before the det time, and he and his brother did a good job. Hell, everyone did a good job, since none were detected beforehand. They also built a device very similar to what Craft put together, but so did most of the others, per the plan."
Suit 1: "What kind of images do we have on them?"
Suit 2: "That is one of the issues we are sorting through. Because they were a back-up team, we only have limited footage, and the majority of it came from the civilian sector. We were tracking all of the more 'domestic' types per the plan, with the Iranians and Koreans as the secondaries. The other problem is that the younger brother was not carrying a black backpack as specified, but grey. He placed it, but we don't have good video of the act, and it doesn't fit our base plan. He also did not place it in a perfect location."
Suit 1: "Get graphics on it. Run up some basic civy images for general ID release. Be sure they are degraded. No high def stuff yet."
Suit 2: "Gotcha. What are we going to do when they get outed? You know these types are not going to just roll over and take the fall."
Suit 1: "That's not going to be our problem. Let the locals and FBI take care of that problem.If we work it up, these 'armed and very dangerous Muslim extremists' will find their way into the morgue for resisting."
Suit 2: "That's how it usually happens. But what if it doesn't? Cornered people don't always react the way we expect."
Suit 1: "We have the media and public perception on our side. That is all we need. The bombers have already been convicted, tried, and hung in the court of public opinion, if you have been paying any attention. When it comes time, we can prove they placed the bombs; we can prove they were radicalized; we can prove the eldest went to Russia for training; we can prove they made explosives. We can even gen up some old friends if needed. In fact, we can prove or do anything we want. We have the technology and the unfettered word of the government on our side, and they have nothing. They cannot prove they were working for the FBI or anyone else. They cannot prove they were sent out on a training mission. They cannot prove anything that benefits them."
Suit 2: "What about the grey backpack? An the Craft guys?"
Suit 1: "Details like those are inconsequential. People only see what they want to see...what we want them to see. The media faithfully reports as truth what we feed them. Jones and his followers will continue to be conspiracy theorists regardless of the facts. The media frenzy for the upcoming manhunt will blur the edges and make everything that much more plausible. What idiot would expend millions of dollars and man hours to chase down a couple of innocent Russian Muslim extremists?"
Suit 2: "I shall reserve comment on that last one, boss."
Suit 1: "Just spin up some images. They have nowhere to go. The media will run with it and the public will eat it up."
Suit 2: "I forgot to mention one thing."
Suit 1: "What's that?"
Suit 2: "The younger brother is an American Citizen. Made so on Sept 11, 2012."
Suit 1: (chuckling) "How fitting. I don't see an issue. NDAA will take care of that if he lives, which he won't. I have one word...GITMO."
Suit 2: "Hmmph..."
Suit 1: "Get the graphics. Get it out. Make sure we have enough to get the job done."
Did it happen like this? Probably not. Did it happen like what has been portrayed in the media? No, it didn't. This is just an illustration to show that things are not always what they may seem. I spent some years in the deceit game decades ago, and personally witnessed governmental deception and the use of patsies. It was a regular occurrence for government operatives to develop assets, only to burn them later in order to create cover for illicit dealings and cover for other operations. The deception game is one of the government's most valuable tools. It is paid for with billions of dollars in ill gotten gains in order to provide political cover.
Based on the evidence as has been released, there is ZERO proof that these brothers did what the government says they did (as far as the actual bombings go.) There is also ZERO proof that the government did this operation themselves. Likewise, there has been ZERO evidence presented that implicates anyone in the Boston bombing. All we have to go on is the word of the government through the mouthpiece of the non-investigating media, coupled with non-incriminating photos (some of which have been obviously doctored) and video.
Some people may say that the actions of the brothers following the bombing implicates them in the act. Does it? If you were set-up by your government for an act of terrorism, would you turn yourself in? Would you go quietly or would you fight back like a cornered animal? If you believed that you were working for your government on an operation, only to have your actions turned on you, and knowing that what you did, when looked through a lens in only one direction (one that only the government controls) could not be disputed, realizing that there was no way you could ever be proven innocent, how would you act?
I am not saying that these two brothers did not commit these heinous acts, but I am also not saying they did. Unlike many people, I still believe in the premiss of innocent until proven guilty IN A COURT OF LAW. I find it tyrannical what our government has done in the wake of the Boston bombing. I find it dispicable what Americans have degraded into. I find it disconcerting that so many embrace the chains of tyranny in the false sense that it provides a security that does not, nor will ever exist. I find it deplorable that the majority fail to condemn the government for foisting the falseness of a few men being a threat to national security. A few men can NEVER be a threat to national security! NEVER! If you believe this lie, you should seriously seek psychological help. Our rights are being stripped from every one of us in the name of a complete psyop fabrication, and The People are applauding. We have become a nation of complete fools, with the inability to think critically or rationally. You deserve the shit sandwich you are about to be served, and I am sure you will extend your chained wrists in appreciation of it, gladly accepting the offer of "mustard with your sandwich, sir."
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
REEF, AYE!
Copyright AbsoluteSurvivalist.com 2013. All Rights Reserved.
The preceding article may be reproduced in WHOLE for publication on the web or email for non-commercial purposes only, and/or linked in any web publication. It may not be reproduced in part in any manner or form, in any media for any reason.
RSS Feed